This item is non-discoverable
Avaliação da restrição do volume do recipiente de cultivo no crescimento e alocação de recursos em espécies arbóreas de Cerrado
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
Abstract
The decrease in the woody component of the Cerrado Biome vegetation is a major threat to
remaining natural areas. Factors such as the low availability of seedlings of native species in
nurseries and the conditions in which they are grown can end up affecting the outcome of these projects. THE
Container volume is often considered one of the most influential variables on morphology.
of the seedlings. Therefore, the restriction imposed by small containers on seedling cultivation may have
consequences on the performance of the species even after planting in the definitive location. Therefore, the objective was to experimentally evaluate the effect of limiting the volume of the cultivation container
of seedlings in growth in height and in the allocation of resources between roots and aerial parts of plants
four native forest species. An experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, at Embrapa Gado de Corte in Campo Grande, MS among the months of April 2018 and January 2019. The fully randomized experiment consisting of
three levels treatment: 110 cm3 volume tube (A1), 290 cm3 tube (A2) and 7000 cm3 tube (CT). The height of the seedlings was recorded weekly and at the end of 112 and 224 days the heights were also recorded.
following architectural measurements: Root dry mass (MSR), shoot dry mass (MSPA), fraction of
root mass (FMR) and plant dry mass (MSP). The growth of seedlings of the four species over time
differed between treatments, with the CT container being the one with the highest averages at the end of 224
evaluation days. The volume of the culture vessel influenced the MSR and MSPA in 112 and 224 days
for A. peregrina, M. urundeuva and J. cuspidifolia, but H. stigonocarpa was influenced only by
cultivation time and not by treatments at each time. For FMR in H. stigonocarpa and J.
cuspidifolia the smaller volume containers allocated more resources to the roots at 112 days, whereas A.
peregrina at 224 days showed the same relationship. As expected, the container with the largest volume,
citropote with 7000 cm³, was the one with the highest average plant heights at the end of the season.
experiment. The volume available for root growth directly influenced the
development of the root system and aerial parts of these plants. The adjusted models suggest
that throughout growth, young plants tended to allocate less biomass to the roots in
in relation to the aerial parts, with the exception of H. stigonocarpa in both times and J. cuspidifolia in the
time 112 days.
Description
Citation
Abreu AHM, Leles PSS, Melo LA, Ferreira DHAA, Monteiro FAS. 2014. Produção de mudas e
crescimento inicial em campo de Enterolobium contortisiliquum produzidas em diferentes recipientes.
Floresta 45:141-15
Atwater DZ, James JJ, Leger EA. 2015. Seedling root traits strongly influence field survival and
performance of a common bunchgrass. Basic and Applied Ecology 16:128-140.
Atwell BJ. 1988. Physiological responses of lupin roots to soil compaction. Plant and Soil 111:277-
281.
Beuchle R, Grecchi RC, Shimabukuro YE, Seliger R, Eva HD, Sano E, Achard F. 2015. Land cover
changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote
sensing sampling approach. Applied Geography 58:116-127.
Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HÁ. 1985. Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:363–392.
Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Hernández EI, Matos A, Vallejo VR. 2008. Effects of a deep container on
morpho-functional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L seedlings for reforestation
in Mediterranean climate. Forest Ecology and Management 256:779-785.
Climent J, Chambel MR, Pardos M, Lario F, Villar-Salvador P. 2011. Biomass allocation and foliage
heteroblasty in hard pine species respond differentially to reduction in rooting volume. European
Journal of Forest Research 130:841–850.
Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM, David D. 1994. Ackerly Interpreting phenotypic variation in
plants. TREE 9:187-191.
De La Fuente LM, Ovalle JF, Arellano EC, Ginocchio R. 2017. Use of alternative containers for
promoting deep rooting of native forest species used for dryland restoration: the case of Acacia caven.
iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 10:776.
De Melo LA, Abreu AHM, Leles PSS, de Oliveira RR, da Silva DT. 2018. Qualidade e crescimento
inicial de mudas de Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth produzidas em diferentes volumes de recipientes.
Ciência Florestal 28:47-55.
Dominguez-Lerena S, Sierra NH, Manzano IC, Bueno LO, Rubira JP, Mexal JG. 2006. Container
characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field Forest Ecology and
Management 221:63-71.
Fascella G, Rouphael Y. 2017. Influence of container volume and irrigation system on photosynthesis,
water productivity and growth of potted Euphorbia × lomi. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 16:163–171.
Gordon WS, Jackson RB. 2000. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecology 81:275–280.
Grossnickle SC, MacDonald JE. 2018. Why seedlings grow: Influence of plant atributes. New Forests
49:1–34.
Hérault B, Bachelot B, Poorter L, Rossi V, Bongers F, Chave J, ... & Baraloto, C. 2011. Functional
traits shape ontogenetic growth trajectories of rain forest tree species. Journal of ecology 99:1431-
1440.
Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soils Berkeley.
California Agricultural Experimental Station 347.
Kharkina TG, Ottosen C-O, Rosenqvist E. 1999. Effects of root restriction on the growth and
physiology of cucumber plants. Physiologia Plantarum 105:434 – 441.
Lambers HANS, Poorter H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for
physiological causes and ecological consequences. In Advances in ecological research, Academic
Press, v.23, p.187-261.
Lima Junior MJV. 2010. ed. Manual de Procedimentos para Análise de Sementes Florestais. UFAM -
Manaus-Amazonas, Brasil.146p.
Martínez-Gutiérrez GA, Morales I, Aquino-Bolaños T, Escamirosa-Tinoco C, Hernández-Tolentino
M. 2016. Substrate volume and nursery times for earliness and yield of greenhouse tomato. Emirates
Journal of Food and Agriculture 28:897-902.
Mašková T, Herben T. 2018. Root:shoot ratio in developing seedlings: How seedlings change their
allocation in response to seed mass and ambient nutrient supply. Ecology and Evolution 1–8.
McConnaughay KDM, Bazzaz FA. 1992. The occupation and fragmentation of space: consequences
of neighbouring roots. Functional Ecology 6:704-710.
NeSmith DS, Duval JR. 1998. The effect of container size. HorTechnology 8:495-498.
Oliveira RS, Bezerra L, Davidson EA, Pinto F, Klink CA, Nepstad DC, Moreira A. 2005. Deep root
function in soil water dynamics in cerrado savannas of central Brazil. Functional Ecology 19:574-581.
Origin 8.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA)
Palma AC, Laurance SG. 2015. A review of the use of direct seeding and seedling plantings in
restoration: what do we know and where should we go? Applied Vegetation Science 18:561-568.
Pereira SR, Laura VA, de Souza ALT.2013. Establishment of Fabaceae Tree Species in a Tropical
Pasture: Influence of Seed Size and Weeding Methods. Restoration Ecology 21:67–74.
Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Urcelay C. 2016.
Corrigendum to: new handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide.
Australian Journal of Botany 64:715-716.
Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves,
stems and roots: meta‐analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist
193:30-50.
Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Roy DB, Warman LIZ, Walker KJ, Rothery P. 2003. Plant traits as predictors
of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of applied Ecology 40:65-77.
Riikonen J, Luoranen J. 2018. Seedling Production and the Field Performance of Seedlings. Forests
9:740.
Rymen B, Kawamura A, Schäfer S, Breuer C, Iwase A, ShibataM, Ikeda M, Mitsuda N, Koncz C,
Ohme-Takagi M, Matsui M, Sugimoto K. 2017. ABA Suppresses Root Hair Growth via the OBP4
Transcriptional Regulator .Plant Physiology 173:1750–1762.
Semchenko M, Zobel K, Heinemeyer A, Hutchings MJ. 2008. Foraging for space and avoidance of
physical obstructions by plant roots: a comparative study of grasses from contrasting habitats. New
Phytologist 179:1162-1170.
Silva JF, Fariñas MR, Felfili JM, Klink CA. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, land use and conservation in
the cerrado region of Brazil. Journal of Biogeography 33:536–548.
Systat. 2012. Systat for Windows, Version 130 (BA Tangen, MG Bu, eds.). Systat Software Inc,
Richmond, California.
Ternesi M, Andrade AP, Jorrin J, Benlloch M. 1994. Root-shoot signalling in sunflower plants with
confined root systems. Plant and Soi1 166:31-36.
Tian N, Fang S, Yang W, Shang X, Fu X. 2017. Influence of Container Type and Growth Medium on
Seedling Growth and Root Morphology of Cyclocarya paliurus during Nursery Culture. Forests 8:387.
Vallone HS, Guimarães RJ, Mendes ANG, Souza CAS, da Cunha RL, Dias FP. 2010. Containers and
substrates in seedlings production of coffee tree. Ciência agrotecnology 34:55-60.
Yong JWH, Letham DS, Wong SC, Farquhar GD. 2010. Effects of root restriction on growth and
associated cytokinin levels in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Functional Plant Biology 37:974–984.