A NOVAFALA E O CRIMEPENSAR EM “1984”: O DIREITO À LIBERDADE DO PENSAMENTO EM ORWELL E A JURISPRUDÊNCIA DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL NA ADI 2.566

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the concepts of freedom of speech, information/dissemination of facts and manifestation of thought, as well as their limitations in George Orwell's "1984", in addition to their effectiveness in Brazil through the jurisprudence formed by the Federal Supreme Court through Direct Action for the Declaration of Unconstitutionality 2. 566. The article discusses the importance of freedom of speech for democracy and for the effectiveness of other fundamental rights, through the use of legislation, jurisprudence and doctrine, using the hypothetical-deductive method. The conclusion is that the free expression of is one of the bases of the Democratic State of Law, as well as a foundation of the Federative Republic of Brazil, so that, in the event of doubts as to its extent or limitation, the Supreme Court should establish a clear Picture as to its limitation, considering its importance for the Democratic State of Law, and any damage caused should be subject to judicial control a posteriori.