AMICUS CURIAE COMO UMA FERRAMENTA PARA AMPLIAR A PARTICIPAÇÃO POPULAR NO PROCESSO CIVIL BRASILEIRO

Abstract

This article analyzes the role of amicus curiae in Brazilian civil procedural law, especially after its regulation by the 2015 CPC. The objective is to broaden the debate on popular participation in justice, highlighting the importance of this institution for the democratization of the judicial process. The research is based on laws, doctrines, academic articles, and relevant cases, with an emphasis on the judgments of the Supreme Federal Court. The method used includes a critical analysis of the contributions and limitations of amicus curiae, exploring its relevance in broadening the legal debate and diversifying perspectives in judicial decisions. The study shows that, despite the benefits, such as greater plurality of voices and strengthening the legitimacy of judgments, the role of amicus curiae must observe strict criteria to ensure its impartiality and relevance. It is concluded that amicus curiae is a valuable tool for improving civil procedure, contributing to a more robust and democratic jurisprudence. However, clear guidelines and legislative adjustments are needed to mitigate criticisms related to their interference and ensure a balance between social participation and procedural speed.