This item is non-discoverable
Integrando os modelos de distribuição das espécies: Sterculia apetala (Jacq.) Karst, Aalea phalerata Mart. ex Spreng e Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus Latham, para o Bioma Pantanal, implicações para conservação e restauração
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDM) have been used to assist decision making in different
aspects of conservation and restoration. However, for effective application of SDMs in
conservation, these models need to discriminate between suitable and unsuitable environments, and
to be developed at fine scales. Limiting factors, to these models, also need to be understood better,
such as the effects of species occurrence records and the relationship between the scale at which the
predictor variable interacts with the species distribution and the scale of the study. We sought to
understand the effects of two methods that reduce bias (geographic vs. environmental filter) and
three predictor variable types in local models (climactic, local, and biotic). We explore these six
model types for the hyacinth macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus), a globally vulnerable species
in the Pantanal wetland region of southwestern Brazil. We consider broad-scale niche relations,
local-scale habitat associations, and interactions with two plant species, which the bird depends on
as a food and nidification source. We found that using climate variables for local-scale models can
generate models that underrepresent suitable areas, whereas using local and biotic variables
generated more accurate models with predictions consistent with the known distribution of the bird
species. Although not commonly used, such variables strongly affect the of model development by
increasing accuracy, reducing omission error, and leading to more conservative predictions. The
best results obtained by these models showed the importance of these variables in the distribution of
species at the local scale.
Description
Citation
Alvarenga, S.M., Brasil, A.E, Pinheiro, R., Kux, H.J.H. 1984. Estudo geomorfológico aplicado
à Bacia do Alto Paraguai e Pantanais Mato-grossenses. Boletim Técnico. Série Geomorfológica, 1.
Projeto RADAMBRASIL. Salvador, 89–183.
Antas, P. de T., Carrara, L., Yabe, R. de S., Ubaid, F., Júnior, S. de O., Vasques, E., Ferreira, L.,
2010. A arara-azul na Reserva Particular de Patrimônio Natural Sesc Pantanal. Rio de Janeiro.
Atauchi, P.J., Peterson, A.T., Flanagan, J., 2018. Species distribution models for Peruvian
plantcutter improve with consideration of biotic interactions. J. Avian Biol. 49, jav-01617.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01617
BirdLife International (2020) Species factsheet: Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus. Downloaded
from http://www.birdlife.org on 03/06/2020.
Boria, R.A., Olson, L.E., Goodman, S.M., Anderson, R.P., 2014. Spatial filtering to reduce
sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol. Modell. 275, 73–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
Brasil, 2010. Cadastro Nacional de Unidades de Conservação – CNUC [WWW Document].
URL http://www.mma.gov.br/areasprotegidas/ cadastro-nacional-de-ucs
Cantor, S.B., Sun, C.C., Tortolero-Luna, G., Richards-Kortum, R., Follen, M., 1999. A
comparison of c/b ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis scott. J.
Clin. Epidemiol. 230, 694–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00075-X
Castellanos, A.A., Huntley, J.W., Voelker, G., Lawing, A.M., 2019. Environmental filtering
improves ecological niche models across multiple scales. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 481–492.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13142
CDB, Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010. Decision adopted by the Conference of the
Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at tis tenth meeting. Nagoya. Ed.: UNEP.
UNEP/CDB/COP/DEC/X/2
Cobos, M.E., Peterson, A.T., Barve, N., Osorio-Olvera, L., 2019. kuenm: an R package for
detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7, e6281.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6281
Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., Wehberg, J.,
Wichmann, V., Böhner, J., 2015. System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4.
Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 1991–2007. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015
Dvorak, W.S., Urueña, H., Moreno, L.A., Goforth, J., 1998. Provenance and family variation
in Sterculia apetala in Colombia. For. Ecol. Manage. 111, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-
1127(98)00316-8
Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y.E., Yates, C.J., 2011. A statistical
explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-
4642.2010.00725.x
Ferreira, L.V., Ventecinque, E., Almeida, S., 2005. O desmatamento na Amazônia e a
importância das áreas protegidas 19, 157–166.
Galetti, M., Guimarães, P.R., 2004. Seed dispersal of Attalea phalerata (Palmae) by Crested
caracaras (Caracara plancus) in the Pantanal and a review of frugivory by raptors. Ararajuba 12, 133–
135.
Guedes, N.M.R., 1993. Biologia Reprodutiva da Arara Azul no Pantanal Sul-Matogrossense.
Dissertação apresentada à Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, da Universidade de São
Paulo, para obtenção do título de “Mestre em Ciências”. 122 p.
Guedes NMR (1995) Competition and losses of Hyacinth macaws nests in the Pantanal,
Brazil. In: CONGRESO DE ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL, V, Resumos, Asunción, Paraguay,
1995. p.70.
Guedes NMR (2002) The Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) Project in the
Pantanal South, Brazil. In: Congresso Mundial sobre Papagayos. Conservando Los Loros y Sus
Habitats, V, Ed. Loro Parque, Tenerife, España, 18-21/09/2002, p.163-174.
Guedes, N.M.R. & Harper, L.H. 1995. Hyacinth Macaw in the Pantanal. Conservation and
Management. Pp. 394-421. In: The large macaws: their care, breeding and conservation. J. Abramson,
B.L. Speer, & J.B. Thomsen, (eds). Raintree Publications, Fort Bragg.
Guedes NMR, Bianchi CA & Barros Y. (2008) Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus. In:Machado,
ÂBM, Drummond GM, Paglia AP (eds) Livro vermelho da fauna Brasileira ameaçada de extinção, 1st
edn. . Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasilia, 467−468 pp.
Guedes N, Carvalho A, Toledo MCB (2006) Uso do Sistema de Informação Geográfica (SIG)
em trabalhos de conservação das araras-azuis e vermelhas no Pantanal sul-mato-grossense. Ensaios e
Ciência Uniderp- Ciências Biológicas. Campo Grande. Ed: Uniderp, Vol.10(1): :167–179.
Guerra, A., Roque, F. de O., Garcia, L.C., Ochao-Quintero, J.M.O., Oliveira, P.T.S., Guariento,
R.D., Rosa, I.M.D., 2020a. Drivers and projections of vegetation loss in the Pantanal and surrounding
ecosystems. Land Use Policy 91, 104388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104388
Guerra, A., Oliveira, P.T.S. de, Roque, F. de O., Rosa, I.M.D., Ochoa-Quintero, J.M.,
Guariento, R.D., Colman, C.B., Dib, V., Maioli, V., Strassburg, B., Garcia, L.C., 2020b. The
importance of Legal Reserves for protecting the Pantanal biome and preventing agricultural losses. J.
Environ. Manage. 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110128
Guerra A, Reis LK, Borges FLG, Ojeda PTA, Pineda DAM, Miranda CO, Laurance SG,
Garcia LC. 2020c. Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: Identifying advances and gaps. Forest
Ecology and Management, 458:117802.
Hamilton, S.K., Sippel, S.J., Melack, J.M., 1996. Inundation patterns in the Pantanal wetland
of South America determined from passive microwave remote sensing. Hydrobiologie 137, 1–23.
Harris, M.B., Silva, S.M., 2006. Estimativa da perda de cobertura vegetal original na Bacia do
Alto Paraguai e Pantanal brasileiro: Ameaças e perspectivas. Nat. Conserv. 4, 50–66.
Harris, M.B., Tomas, W., Mourão, G., Da Silva, C.J., Guimarães, E., Sonoda, F., Fachim, E.,
2005. Safeguarding the pantanal wetlands: Threats and conservation initiatives. Conserv. Biol. 19, 714–
720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00708.x
Heikkinen, R.K., Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., Pearson, R.G., Körber, J.H., 2007. Biotic
interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16,
754–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00345.x
Hengl, T., De Jesus, J.M., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Gonzalez, M.R., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A.,
Shangguan, W., Wright, M.N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M.A., Vargas, R.,
MacMillan, R.A., Batjes, N.H., Leenaars, J.G.B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., Kempen, B.,
2017. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning, PLoS ONE. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748
Johnson, M., Tomas, W., Guedes, N., 1997. On the Hyacinth macaw’s nesting tree: density of
young manduvis around adult trees under three different management conditions in the Pantanal
wetland, Brasil. Ararajuba 5, 185–188.
Jorge, M.L.S.P., Galetti, M., Ribeiro, M.C., Ferraz, K.M.P.M.B., 2013. Mammal defaunation
as surrogate of trophic cascades in a biodiversity hotspot. Biol. Conserv. 163, 49–57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.018
Júnior, A. dos S., 2006. Aspéctos populacionais de Sterculia apetala (Jacq.) Karst
(Sterculiaceae) como subsídios ao plano de conservação da arara-azul no Sul do Pantanal, Mato Grosso
do Sul. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul.
Júnior, A. dos S., 2010. Análise de populações de Sterculia apetala em diferentes cenários de
manejo da paisagem e sua influência no oferecimento futuro de habitat reprodutivo para
Anodorhynchus hyacintinus no Pantanal. (doctoral teses) Universidade de Brasília.
Júnior, A.S., Tomas, W.M., Ishii, I.H., Guedes, N.M.R., Hay, J.D., 2007. Occurrence of
Hyacinth Macaw nesting sites in Sterculia apetala in the Pantanal Wetland, Brazil. Gaia Sci. 1, 127–
130. https://doi.org/10.21707/gs.v1i2.2268
Junk, W., Silva, C. da, Cunha, C. da, Wantzen, K., 2011. Pantanal: Ecology, biodiversity and
sustainable management of a large neotropical seasonal wetland. Pensoft Publishers, Moscow.
Junk, W.J., Bayley, P.B., Sparks, R.E., 1989. The flood pulse concept. Int. Large River Symp.
110–127.
Junk, W.J., Da Cunha, C.N., Wantzen, K.M., Petermann, P., Strüssmann, C., Marques, M.I.,
Adis, J., 2006. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat. Sci. 68,
278–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-006-0851-4
Keuroghlian, A., Eaton, D.P., Desbiez, A.L.J., 2009. The response of a landscape species,
white-lipped peccaries, to seasonal resource fluctuations in a tropical wetland, the Brazilian pantanal.
Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 1, 087–097.
Kramer-Schadt, S., Niedballa, J., Pilgrim, J.D., Schröder, B., Lindenborn, J., Reinfelder, V.,
Stillfried, M., Heckmann, I., Scharf, A.K., Augeri, D.M., Cheyne, S.M., Hearn, A.J., Ross, J.,
Macdonald, D.W., Mathai, J., Eaton, J., Marshall, A.J., Semiadi, G., Rustam, R., Bernard, H., Alfred,
R., Samejima, H., Duckworth, J.W., Breitenmoser-Wuersten, C., Belant, J.L., Hofer, H., Wilting, A.,
2013. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Divers.
Distrib. 19, 1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12096
Liu, C., White, M., Newell, G., 2011. Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species
distribution models with presence-absence data. Ecography. 34, 232–243.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06354.x
Manning, Adrian D., David B. Lindenmayer, and Simon C. Barry. 2004. The conservation
implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural “matrix”: a case study of the vulnerable superb
parrot of south-eastern Australia. Biological conservation 120.3: 363-374.
Moraes, E.C., Pereira, G., Cardozo, F. da S., 2013. Evaluation of reduction of Pantanal
wetlands in 2012. Geografia 38, 81–93.
Naimi B., Hamm N.A., Groen T.A., Skidmore A.K., Toxopeus A.G., 2014. Where is positional
uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling. Ecography, 37, 191-203. doi:10.1111/j.1600-
0587.2013.00205.x .
Padovani, C.R., 2017. Conversão da vegetação natural do Pantanal para uso antrópico de
1976 até 2017 e projeção para 2050. Comunicado Técnico 109. Embrapa Pantanal, Corumbá.
Padovani, C.R, 2010. Dinâmica Espaço-Temporal das inundações do Pantanal. (doctoral tesis)
Escola superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz.”
Peterson, A.T., Papeş, M., Soberón, J., 2008. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic
analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Modell. 213, 63–72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
Phillips, S.B., Aneja, V.P., Kang, D., Arya, S.P., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species
geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 6, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Pott, A., Pott, V., 1994. Plantas do Pantanal. Embrapa-SPI, Brasília.
Pott, A., 1995. Relações da vegetação com ambientes do Pantanal, Livro de resumos do
Encontro sobre sensoriamento remoto aplicado a estudos no Pantanal. Corumbá, MS.
Pott, A., Pott, V., 1999. Flora do Pantanal: listagem atual de fanerogamas. (No. 2), simpósio
sobre recursos naturais e socio-econômicos do pantanal. Corumbá, MS.
Pott, A., Pott, V.J., 2009. Vegetação do Pantanal: fitogeografia e dinâmica (No. 2), Simpósio
de Geotecnologias no Pantanal. Corumbá, MS.
Pott, A., Oliveira, A., Damasceno-Junior, G., Silva, J., 2011. Plant diversity of the Pantanal
wetland. Brazilian J. Biol. 71, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842011000200005
Pott, A., Oliveira, A., Damasceno-Junior, G., Silva, J., 2011. Plant diversity of the Pantanal
wetland. Brazilian J. Biol. 71, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842011000200005
Pressey, R.L., 1994. Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing
representative reserve systems ?. Conserv. Biol. 8, 662–668.
Pressey, R.L., Whish, G.L., Barrett, T.W., Watts, M.E., 2002. Effectiveness of protected areas
in north-eastern New South Wales: Recent trends in six measures. Biol. Conserv. 106, 57–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00229-4
Presti, F.T., Guedes, N.M.R., Antas, P.T.Z., Miyaki, C.Y., 2015. Population genetic structure in
hyacinth macaws (anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) and identification of the probable origin of confiscated
individuals. J. Hered. 106, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv038
Quiroga-Castro, V.D., Roldán, A.I., 2001. The fate of Attalea phalerata (palmae) seeds
dispersed to a tapir latrine. Biotropica 33, 472. https://doi.org/10.1646/0006-
3606(2001)033[0472:tfoapp]2.0.co;2
R Core Team, 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Radosavljevic, A., Anderson, R.P., 2014. Making better Maxent models of species
distributions: Complexity, overfitting and evaluation. J. Biogeogr. 41, 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/
jbi.12227
Ragusa-Netto, J., 2004. Flowers, fruits, and the abundance of the yellow-chevroned parakeet
(Brotogeris chiriri) at a gallery forest in the South Pantanal (Brazil). Braz. J. Biol. 64, 867–877.
Roque, F.O., Ochoa-Quintero, J., Ribeiro, D.B., Sugai, L.S.M., Costa-Pereira, R., Lourival, R.,
Bino, G., 2016. Upland habitat loss as a threat to Pantanal wetlands. Conserv. Biol. 30, 1131–1134.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12713
Seixas, GHF, Guedes, NMR, Martinez, J, Prestes, NP (2002) Uso de radiotelemetria no estudo
de Psitacídeos. In: Galetti, M, Pizzo, MA (Eds). Ecologia e Conservação de Psitacídeos no Brasil. Belo
Horizonte. Melopsittacus Publicações Científicas, 141-156.
Silva, J.V.S., Abdon, M. 1998. Delimitação do Pantanal Brasileiro e suas sub-regiões. Pesq.
Agropec. Bras.. Brasília. V. 33, Número Especial, p.1703-1711.
Silva, J.V.S., Abdon, M., Silva, S.M., Moraes, J.A., 2011. Evolution of deforestation in the
brazilian Pantanal and surroundings in the timeframe 1976 -2008. Geografia 36, 35–55.
SOS-Pantanal, WWF-Brasil, ECOA, C.-I., Fundacion-AVINA, 2014. Monitoramento das
alterações da cobertura vegetal e uso do solo na Bacia do Alto Paraguai Porção Brasileira: 2012 a 2014.
WWF- Brasil. Brasília.
SOS-Pantanal, WWF-Brasil, ECOA, C.-I., Fundacion-AVINA, 2017. Monitoramento das
alterações da cobertura vegetal e uso do solo na Bacia do Alto Paraguai Porção Brasileira-Período de
análise: 2016 a 2017. WWF- Brasil. Brasília.
Sousa-Baena, M.S., Garcia, L.C., Peterson, A.T., 2014. Completeness of digital accessible
knowledge of the plants of Brazil and priorities for survey and inventory. Divers. Distrib. 20, 369–381.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12136
Tella, J.L., Hiraldo, F., Pacifico, E., Díaz-Luque, J.A., Dénes, F.V., Fontoura, F.M., Guedes,
N.M.R., Blanco, G. (2020) Conserving the Diversity of Ecological Interactions: The Role of Two
Threatened Macaw Species as Legitimate Dispersers of “Megafaunal” fruits. Diversity. 12 (2) 45 doi:
10.3390/d12020045
Tomas, W.M., Garcia, L.C., Roque, F.O., Lourival, R., Dias, F., Salis, S.M., Mourão, G.M.
2018. Análise dos conceitos de “mesma identidade ecológica”, “equivalência ecológica” e “offsetting”
para compensação de Reserva Legal. Embrapa Pantanal, Corumbá.
Tomas, W.M., de Oliveira Roque, F., Morato, R.G., Medici, P.E., Chiaravalloti, R.M., Tortato,
F.R., Penha, J.M.F.F., Izzo, T.J., Garcia, L.C., Lourival, R.F.F.F., Girard, P., Albuquerque, N.R.,
Almeida-Gomes, M., Andrade, M.H. d. S. da S., Araujo, F.A.S.S., Araujo, A.C., Arruda, E.C. d. de,
Assunção, V.A., Battirola, L.D., Benites, M., Bolzan, F.P., Boock, J.C., Bortolotto, I.M., Brasil, M. da
S., Camilo, A.R., Campos, Z., Carniello, M.A., Catella, A.C., Cheida, C.C., Crawshaw, P.G., Crispim,
S.M.A., Junior, G.A.D., Desbiez, A.L.J., Dias, F.A., Eaton, D.P., Faggioni, G.P., Farinaccio, M.A.,
Fernandes, J.F.A.A., Ferreira, V.L., Fischer, E.A., Fragoso, C.E., Freitas, G.O., Galvani, F., Garcia,
A.S., Garcia, C.M., Graciolli, G., Guariento, R.D., Guedes, N.M.R.R., Guerra, A., Herrera, H.M.,
Hoogesteijn, R., Ikeda, S.C., Juliano, R.S., Kantek, D.L.Z.K., Keuroghlian, A., Lacerda, A.C.R., Restel,
A.L.R., Landeiro, V.L., Laps, R.R., Layme, V., Leimgruber, P., Rocha, F.L., Mamede, S., Marques,
D.K.S.S., Marques, M.I., Mateus, L.A.F.F., Moraes, R.N., Moreira, T.A., Mourão, G.M., Nicola, R.D.,
Nogueira, D.G., Nunes, A.P., Nunes da Cunha, C. da, Oliveira, M.R., Divina., M., Paggi, G.M.,
Pellegrin, A.O., Pereira, G.M.F.F., Peres, I.A.H.F.S., Pinho, J.B., Pinto, J.O.P.P., Pott, A., Provete, D.B.,
dos Reis, V.D.A.A., dos Reis, L.K., Renaud, P.-C.C., Ribeiro, D.B., Rossetto, O.C., Sabino, J., Rumiz,
D., Salis, S.M., Santana, D.J., Santos, S.A., Sartori, Â.L., Sato, M., Schuchmann, K.-L.L., ScreminDias, E., Seixas, G.H.F.F., Severo-Neto, F., Sigrist, M.R., Silva, A., Silva, C.J., Siqueira, A.L., Soriano,
B.M.A.A., Sousa, L.M., Souza, F.L., Strussmann, C., Sugai, L.S.M.M., Tocantins, N., Urbanetz, C.,
Valente-Neto, F., Viana, D.P., Yanosky, A., Junk, W.J., 2019. Sustainability Agenda for the Pantanal
Wetland: Perspectives on a Collaborative Interface for Science, Policy, and Decision-Making.Trop.
Conserv. Sci. 12, 194008291987263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919872634
Vale, C.G., Tarroso, P., Brito, J.C., 2014. Predicting species distribution at range margins:
Testing the effects of study area extent, resolution and threshold selection in the Sahara-Sahel transition
zone. Divers. Distrib. 20, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12115
Varela, S., Anderson, R.P., García-Valdés, R., Fernández-González, F., 2014. Environmental
filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models.
Ecography (Cop.). 37, 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00441.x
Warren, D.L., Wright, A.N., Seifert, S.N., Shaffer, H.B., 2014. Incorporating model
complexity and spatial sampling bias into ecological niche models of climate change risks faced by 90
California vertebrate species of concern. Divers. Distrib. 20, 334–343.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12160
Warren, D.L., Seifert, S.N., 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: The importance of
model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol. Appl. 21, 335–342.
https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1171.1
Warren, D.L., Wright, A.N., Seifert, S.N., Shaffer, H.B., 2014. Incorporating model
complexity and spatial sampling bias into ecological niche models of climate change risks faced by 90
California vertebrate species of concern. Divers. Distrib. 20, 334–343.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12160
Yamashita, C., 1997. Anodorhynchus macaws as followers of extinct megafauna: an
hypothesis. Ararajuba 5, 176–182.