Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/4915
Tipo: Artigo de Periódico
Título: Postural instability in subjects with Parkinson’s disease undergoing different sensory pitfalls
Autor(es): Silva, Thaís Cardoso da
Felippe, Lilian Assunção
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Christofoletti, Gustavo
Resumo: Purpose Previous research has reported postural instability in subjects with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, there are still doubts about the effect of sensory stimuli on one’s balance. In this study, we further investigated the stabilometric measures of individuals with PD, analysing the impact of different sensory stimuli on the outcomes. Methods The total of 26 participants (13 with PD and 13 matched control peers) were submitted to 8 sensorimotor dynamics differing in relation to support base (30 cm vs. 10 cm, feet in parallel vs. feet in semi-tandem position), contact surface (foam vs. no foam), and visual conditions (eyes open vs. eyes closed). The measures used to assess one’s balance were body position in space, area of support base, and velocity of postural control. The variables involved the anterior-posterior and the mediolateral axes. Participants with PD were evaluated during the off medication state. Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman’s test were applied to carry out inter- and intra-group comparisons. Significance was set at 5%. Results Cross-sectional analyses illustrated that tasks with sensory pitfalls impacted postural stability to a larger extent in PD subjects. The differences were found in anterior-posterior body position, area of support base, anterior-posterior velocity, and mediolateral velocity. Complementary analyses confirmed considerable instability on balance when support bases were small and visual information was absent (p < 0.05). Conclusions The current results confirm worse postural stability response in subjects with PD and highlight that the interference of the sensory pitfalls is notable when individuals are off medication.
Abstract: Purpose Previous research has reported postural instability in subjects with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, there are still doubts about the effect of sensory stimuli on one’s balance. In this study, we further investigated the stabilometric measures of individuals with PD, analysing the impact of different sensory stimuli on the outcomes. Methods The total of 26 participants (13 with PD and 13 matched control peers) were submitted to 8 sensorimotor dynamics differing in relation to support base (30 cm vs. 10 cm, feet in parallel vs. feet in semi-tandem position), contact surface (foam vs. no foam), and visual conditions (eyes open vs. eyes closed). The measures used to assess one’s balance were body position in space, area of support base, and velocity of postural control. The variables involved the anterior-posterior and the mediolateral axes. Participants with PD were evaluated during the off medication state. Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman’s test were applied to carry out inter- and intra-group comparisons. Significance was set at 5%. Results Cross-sectional analyses illustrated that tasks with sensory pitfalls impacted postural stability to a larger extent in PD subjects. The differences were found in anterior-posterior body position, area of support base, anterior-posterior velocity, and mediolateral velocity. Complementary analyses confirmed considerable instability on balance when support bases were small and visual information was absent (p < 0.05). Conclusions The current results confirm worse postural stability response in subjects with PD and highlight that the interference of the sensory pitfalls is notable when individuals are off medication.
Palavras-chave: Parkinson’s disease
postural stability
balance
stabilometry
CNPq: Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional
Idioma: eng
País: Brasil
Editor: University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw
Citação: Kerr GK, Worringham CJ, Cole MH, Lacherez PF, Wood JM, Silburn PA. Predictors of future falls in Par- Brought to you by | Fundação Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul UFMS Authenticated T.C. da Silva, L.A. Felippe, R.L. Carregaro, G. Christofoletti, Postural instability in Parkinson’s disease HUMAN MOVEMENT Human Movement, Vol. 18, No 4, 2017, 55-60 http://humanmovement.pl/ kinson disease. Neurology. 2010;75(2):116–124; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e7b688. 2. Racette BA, Willis AW. Time to change the blind men and the elephant approach to Parkinson disease? Neurology. 2015;85(2):190–196; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001739. 3. Christofoletti G, McNeely ME, Campbell MC, Duncan RP, Earhart GM. Investigation of factors impacting mobility and gait in Parkinson disease. Hum Mov Sci. 2016; 49:308–314; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.08.007. 4. Fling BW, Cohen RG, Mancini M, Carpenter SD, Fair DA, Nutt JG, et al. Functional reorganization of the locomotor network in Parkinson patients with freezing of gait. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100291; doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0100291. 5. Marchese R, Bove M, Abbruzzese G. Effect of cognitive and motor tasks on postural stability in Parkinson’s disease: a posturographic study. Mov Disord. 2013;18(6): 652–658; doi: 10.1002/mds.10418. 6. Lahr J, Pereira MP, Pelicioni PH, De Morais LC, Gobbi LT. Parkinson’s disease patients with dominant hemibody affected by the disease rely more on vision to maintain upright postural control. Percept Mot Skills. 2015;121(3): 923–934; doi: 10.2466/15.PMS.121c26x0. 7. Rossi-Izquierdo M, Ernst A, Soto-Varela A, Santos-Pérez S, Faraldo-García A, Sesar-Ignacio A, et al. Vibrotactile neurofeedback balance training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: reducing the number of falls. Gait Posture. 2013;37(2):195–200; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.002. 8. Gera G, Freeman DL, Blackinton MT, Horak FB, King L. Identification of balance deficits in people with Parkinson disease: is the sensory organization test enough? Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;4(1):322; doi: 10.4172/2329- 9096.1000322. 9. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17(5):427–442; doi: 10.1212/WNL.17.5.427. 10. Calne DB, Snow BJ, Lee C. Criteria for diagnosing Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1992;32:S125–S127; doi: 10.1002/ana.410320721. 11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189– 198; doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. 12. Brucki SM, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PH, Okamoto IH. Suggestions for utilization of the mini-mental state examination in Brazil [in Portuguese]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(3B):777–781; doi: 10.1590/S0004- 282X2003000500014. 13. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457; doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(07)61602-X. 14. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11): 1621–1626; doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621. 15. Falaki A, Huang X, Lewis MM, Latash ML. Dopaminergic modulation of multi-muscle synergies in postural tasks performed by patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017;33:20–26; doi: 10.1016/j. jelekin.2017.01.002. 16. Kishore A, Popa T, Velayudhan B, Joseph T, Balachandran A, Meunier S. Acute dopamine boost has a negative effect on plasticity of the primary motor cortex in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 7): 2074–2088; doi: 10.1093/brain/aws124. 17. Sutter EN, Seidler KJ, Duncan RP, Earhart GM, McNeely ME. Low to moderate relationships between gait and postural responses in Parkinson disease. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(6):505–511; doi: 10.2340/16501977-2238. 18. Falaki A, Huang X, Lewis MM, Latash ML. Impaired synergic control of posture in Parkinson’s patients without postural instability. Gait Posture. 2016;44:209–215; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.12.035. 19. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. A tactile stimulus applied to the leg improves postural stability in young, old and neuropathic subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2006;406(1–2): 23–26; doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.014. 20. Vitório R, Lirani-Silva E, Barbieri FA, Raile V, Stella F, Gobbi LT. Influence of visual feedback sampling on obstacle crossing behavior in people with Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture. 2013;38(2):330–334; doi: 10.1016/j. gaitpost.2012.12.019. 21. Suarez H, Geisinger D, Ferreira ED, Nogueira S, Arocena S, Roman CS, et al. Balance in Parkinson’s disease patients changing the visual input. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(5):651–655; doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000 500019. 22. Nallegowda M, Singh U, Handa G, Khanna M, Wadhwa S, Yadav SL, et al. Role of sensory input and muscle strength in maintenance of balance, gait, and posture in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(12):898–908; doi: 10.1097/01.PHM. 0000146505.18244.43. 23. Kataoka H, Ueno S. Can postural abnormality really respond to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease? J Neurol Sci. 2017;377:179–184; doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.04.025. 24. Forsyth AL, Paul SS, Allen NE, Sherrington C, Fung VS, Canning CG. Flexed truncal posture in Parkinson disease: measurement reliability and relationship with physical and cognitive impairments, mobility, and balance. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017;41(2):107–113; doi: 10.1097/NPT. 0000000000000171. 25. Kelly VE, Johnson CO, McGough EL, Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB, Chung KA, et al. Association of cognitive domains with postural instability/gait disturbance in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(7): 692–697; doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.04.002. 26. Joutsa J, Gardberg M, Röyttä M, Kaasinen V. Diagnostic accuracy of parkinsonism syndromes by general neurologists. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(8):840– 844; doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.04.019. 27. Aarsland D, Zaccai J, Brayne C. A systematic review of prevalence studies of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2005;20(10):1255–1263; doi: 10.1002/mds. 20527.
Tipo de acesso: Acesso Aberto
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
metadata.dc.rights.uri: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/
Identificador DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humo-2017-0031
URI: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/4915
Data do documento: 26-Fev-2018
Aparece nas coleções:INISA - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Human Movement.pdfArticle773,85 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons