MULHER INDÍGENA E LEI MARIA DA PENHA: UMA ANÁLISE DISCURSIVA TRANSDISCIPLINAR PARA APRENDER A CONSTITUIÇÃO DA SUBJETIVIDADE FRONTEIRIZA

Abstract

By throwing oblique glances under linguistic materialities that have (re) circulated in our society about women, it is possible to say how much their thickness brings statements crossed by (inter) discourses and how their emergence becomes a testimony that enables ( trans)form identity profiles, as well as (de)legitimize the (historical) representations of the subjects in a given culture. Based on this assumption, the objective is to analyze, through discursive cuts, possible effects of meanings in relation to the representation of women, from indigenous ethnicity, and the constitution of a border subjectivity, from the text of the Maria da Penha Law in interface with the work "For Indigenous Women" - idealized by the NGO Thydêwá in partnership with the Secretariat of Policies for Women of the Presidency of the Republic, published in 2015. It is based on the hypothesis that the law and the work, in spite of including the feminine gender in the order of social discourse, on the other hand marginalizes women of indigenous ethnicity, their position of vulnerability, (post-) colonialist relations and the locus cultural border in which it finds itself, as a discursive device that agencies the construction of a peripheral subjectivity. The thesis is anchored in the theoretical transdisciplinarity between: the discursive perspective (CORACINI, 2007, 2010, 2011; GUERRA, 2008, 2010, 2015); the deconstruction - through Derridean theoretical beacons; the Foucaultian theoretical and methodological support - archaeogeneal; and, by another theoretical-conductive thread, the post-colonialist point of view of Anzaldúa (2005, 2009), Menchú (2007), Mignolo (2003), Castro-Gómez (2005), of Sousa-Santos (2010, 2014) and of Nolasco (2013, 2016), since they articulate a displacement for the analysis of a frontier epistemology. In a methodological organization, the thesis is divided into three parts, each one with two chapters: the first part, thinking that the discourse of law and work can only mean by historicity, mobilizes in the first chapter (in two sub-items) the conditions of production in a broad sense in order to understand mediate socio-historical affiliations; The second (with two sub-items) seeks to delineate the circumstance of the enunciation and the immediate socio-historical context in which the materialities emerged. In the second part, chapter three (with three items) mentions the theoretical-methodological outline of the discursive perspective; The fourth (divided into four items) brings up philosopher-authors on the basis of other necessary epistemological orientations (philosophical and postcolonialist) that make it possible to catch and delineate more carefully the discursive instances in the analytic gesture of problematization. Regarding the third part, which brings the parsing of the analytical path, the fifth (three axes) are (d)announced out the production of sense effects, representations and possible interpretations from necessary dialogues with the conditions of the production and with the theoretical-methodological aspects. From the analysis, results point out that law and the work, although they are discursive materialities with statements that promote an invitation to the emancipation of women in the social sphere, on the other hand function as an institutional device that (de) limit traces of the identification processes on the indigenous and (rein) forces the permanence of colonial discourse as an subjectivist mechanism that seeks to control the identity representation of subjects who (even speaking of themselves) are still subjected to the (in)(ex)clusion of hegemonic society.

Keywords: Discourse Analysis; indigenous woman; ex / inclusion; identity(ies).