Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/4868
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorTessari, Giovanna Marina Faques-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T18:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-08-
dc.date.issued2021-11-22-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/4868-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Cell phones are increasingly associated to peoples’ routines. With the recent health crisis arising from the SARS-COV-2 virus, academic and professional activities have been accessible on smartphone devices, which have made this technology even more relevant. Objective: To assess the risks that the use of the cell phones causes on the balance when carried out simultaneously with a second task. Methods: Forty-five participants underwent activities of typing and cell phone conversation while standing still (static balance) or in locomotion (dynamic balance). Statistical analyzes were used to characterize the balance of participants in activities without the use of cell phone and during typing and conversation. Results: Results showed a worse response of balance during typing and talking on the phone. The typing task caused more imbalance during locomotion. The speaking task, differently, caused more imbalance in the static activity. Conclusion: The results allow the conclusion that typing and speaking on the cell phone become causes body imbalance when associated with another motor activity. The recognition of situations in which the smartphone causes body instability is important to guarantee the benefits of this technology without generating risks to the user.pt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sulpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectSmartphonept_BR
dc.subjectEquilíbrio posturalpt_BR
dc.titleUso do smartphone em tarefas simultâneas aumenta a oscilação corporal e reduz a velocidade da marcha impactando o equilíbrio corporalpt_BR
dc.typeTrabalho de Conclusão de Cursopt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Christofoletti, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.advisor1IDhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-7879-239Xpt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5891990397430476pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Medeiros, Arthur de Almeida-
dc.contributor.referee1IDhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2192-8823pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4390913887382221pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Tarnhovi, Evandro Gonzalez-
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1452150174546036pt_BR
dc.creator.IDhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-7565-3917pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3648360857342735pt_BR
dc.description.resumoIntrodução: Os aparelhos celulares estão cada vez mais vinculados às rotinas das pessoas. Com a recente crise sanitária advinda do vírus SARS-COV-2, atividades acadêmicas e profissionais ficaram acessíveis em aparelhos smartphones, deixando essa tecnologia com relevância ainda maior. Objetivo: Avaliar os riscos que o uso do celular gera para o equilíbrio das pessoas quando realizado de forma simultânea a uma segunda tarefa. Métodos: Quarenta e cinco participantes foram submetidos a atividades de digitação e conversação ao celular enquanto permaneceram em pé paradas (equilíbrio estático) ou em locomoção (equilíbrio dinâmico). Análises estatísticas foram utilizadas para caracterizar o equilíbrio dos participantes em atividades sem celular e durante tarefas de digitação e conversação. Resultados: Os resultados apontaram uma piora do equilíbrio nas tarefas de digitar e falar ao celular. A tarefa de digitação causou maior desequilíbrio durante a locomoção. A tarefa da fala, diferentemente, causou maior desequilíbrio na atividade estática. Conclusão: Os resultados permitem concluir que tarefas de digitação e conversação ao celular causam desequilíbrio quando associadas à outra atividade simultânea. O reconhecimento das situações em que o smartphone acarreta instabilidade corporal é importante para garantir os benefícios dessa tecnologia sem gerar riscos ao usuário.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentINISApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMSpt_BR
dc.relation.references1. Silva P, Seabra C, Cunha UF. Smartphones: the nervous system of liquid communication. Media Jornalism. 2019;19(34):65-81. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_34_5. 2. O'Connor S, Andrews T. Smartphones and mobile applications (apps) in clinical nursing education: a student perspective. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;69:172-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013. 3. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua 2018. Acesso à Internet e à televisão e posse de telefone móvel celular para uso pessoal [acesso em 13 abril 2021]. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101631_informativo.pdf. 4. Kim D, Chun H, Lee H. Determing the factors that influence college students’ adoption of smartphones. JASIST. 2014;65(3):578-88. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/asi.22987. 5. Iyengar K, Upadhyaya GK, Vaishya R, Jain V. COVID-19 and applications of smartphone technology in the current pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):733-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.033. 6. Camargo CP, Tempski PZ, Busnardo FF, Martins MA, Gemperli R. Online learning and COVID-19: a meta-synthesis analysis. Clinics. 2020;75:e2286. http://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e2286. 7. Jones RE, Abdelfattah KR. Virtual interviews in the era of COVID-19: A primer for applicants. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(4):733-4. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.020. 8. Jumreornvong O, Yang E, Race J, Appel J. Telemedicine and Medical Education in the Age of Covid-19. Acad Med. 2020;95(12):1838-43. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003711. 9. Aveiro-Róbalo TR, Garlisi-Torales LD. Learning at home during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative of Latin American students. Medwave. 2020;20(5):e7934. http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2020.05.7933. 10. Jameel S, Shahnawaz MG, Griffiths MD. Smartphone addiction in students: A qualitative examination of the components model of addiction using face-to-face interviews. J Behav Addict. 2019; 8(4): 780–93. http://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.57. 11. Hye-Jin K, Jin-Young M, Hyun-Jin K, Kyoung-Bok M. Accident risk associated with smartphone addiction: A study on university students in Korea. J Behav Addict. 2017; 6(4): 699–07. http://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.070. 12. Lin MB, Huang YP. The impact of walking while using a smartphone on pedestrians' awareness of roadside events. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;101:87-96. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.005. 13. Beurskens R, Steinberg F, Antoniewicz F, Wolff W, Granacher U. Neural correlates of dual-task walking: Effects of cognitive versus motor interference in young adults. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:8032180. http://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8032180. 14. Floriano EN, Alves JF, de Almeida IA, de Souza RB, Christofoletti G, Santos SMS. ual task performance: a comparison between healthy elderly individuals and those with Parkinson’s disease. Fisioter Mov. 2015;28(2):251-258. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-5150.028.002.AO05. 15. Felippe LA, de Oliveira RT, Garcia M, Silva-Hamu, TCD, Santos SMS, Christofoletti G. Funções executivas, atividades da vida diária e habilidade motora de idosos com doenças neurodegenerativas. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2014;63(1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000006. 16. Sobrinho Jr SA, Tessari GMF, Lino TB, Pegorare ABG, Christofoletti G. Influência do uso do smartphone sobre o equilíbrio de jovens durante a realização de dupla-tarefa. Rev Bras Ci Saúde. 2021;25(1):147-54. http://doi.org.br/10.22478/ufpb.2317-6032.2021v25n1.52462. 17. Ghaferi AA, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. STROBE Reporting Guidelines for Observational Studies. JAMA Surg. 2021. Online ahead of print. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0528. 18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98. http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. 19. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1621-6. http://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621. 20. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-8. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. 21. Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with Life in college students. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:343-50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049. 22. Lellis-Santos C, Abdulkader F. Smartphone-assisted experimentation as a didactic strategy to maintain practical lessons in remote education: alternatives for physiology education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adv Physiol Educ. 2020;44(4):579-86. http://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00066.2020. 23. Laurence PG, Busin Y, da Cunha Lima HS, Macedo EC. Predictors of problematic smartphone use among university students. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020;33(1):8. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-020-00147-8. 24. Lei LY, Ismail MA, Mohammad JA, Yusoff MSB. The relationship of smartphone addiction with psychological distress and neuroticism among university medical students. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):97. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00466-6. 25. Christofoletti G, Oliani MM, Stella F, Gobbi S, Gobbi LTB. The influence of schooling on cognitive screening test in the elderly. Dement Neuropsychol. Jan-Mar 2007;1(1):46-51. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642008DN10100008. 26. Nosaka S, Imada K, Okamura H. Effects of cognitive dysfunction and dual task on gait speed and prefrontal cortex activation in community-dwelling older adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020:1-13. Online ahead of print. http://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2020.1866156. 27. Onofrei RR, Amaricai E, Suciu O, David VL, Rata AL, Hogea E. Smartphone use and postural balance in healthy young adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3307. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093307. 28. Rebold MJ, Croall CA, Cumberledge EA, Sheehan TP, Dirlam MT. The impact of different cell phone functions and their effects on postural stability. Perform Enhanc Health. 2017;5(3):98-102. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2016.11.004. 29. Hodgson JC, Tremlin R, Hudson JM. Disrupting the speech motor network: Exploring hemispheric specialization for verbal and manual sequencing using a dual-task approach. Neuropsychology. 2019;33(8):1101-10. http://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000589. 30. Niederer D, Bumann A, Mühlhauser Y, Schmitt M, Wess K, Engeroff T et al. Specific smartphone usage and cognitive performance affect gait characteristics during free-living and treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2018;62:415-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.007. 31. Gary CS, Lakhiani C, DeFazio MV, Masden DL, Song DH. Smartphone use during ambulation and pedestrian trauma: a public health concern. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(6):1092-1101. http://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002051. 32. Chen PL, Pai CW. Pedestrian smartphone overuse and inattentional blindness: an observational study in Taipei, Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1342. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6163-5. 33. Risko EF, Kingstone A. Everyday attention. Can J Exp Psychol. 2017;71(2):89-92. http://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000134.pt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqFisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacionalpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Fisioterapia - Bacharelado (INISA)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
TCC Giovanna.pdf725,28 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons