Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/11779
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Probst, Livia Fernandes | - |
dc.creator | Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes | - |
dc.creator | Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz | - |
dc.creator | Grande, Antonio Jose | - |
dc.creator | Croda, Mariana Garcia | - |
dc.creator | Venturini, James | - |
dc.creator | Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo | - |
dc.creator | Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda | - |
dc.creator | Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia | - |
dc.creator | Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone de | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-14T12:56:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-10-07 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-08-07 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/11779 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. Methods We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter. Results A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens. Conclusions We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments. | pt_BR |
dc.language | eng | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Systematic Reviews | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ | * |
dc.subject | Decontamination | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Disinfection | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Sterilization | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Equipment reuse | pt_BR |
dc.subject | N95 respirator | pt_BR |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | pt_BR |
dc.title | Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de Periódico | pt_BR |
dc.description.resumo | Background N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. Methods We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter. Results A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens. Conclusions We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments. | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.country | Brasil | pt_BR |
dc.subject.cnpq | CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | HUMAP - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection a rapid review.pdf Until 2025-10-06 | 906,35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir Solictar uma cópia |
Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons