Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/11779
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorProbst, Livia Fernandes-
dc.creatorGuerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes-
dc.creatorCardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz-
dc.creatorGrande, Antonio Jose-
dc.creatorCroda, Mariana Garcia-
dc.creatorVenturini, James-
dc.creatorFonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo-
dc.creatorPaniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda-
dc.creatorBarreto, Jorge Otávio Maia-
dc.creatorOliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone de-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-14T12:56:06Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-07-
dc.date.issued2021-08-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/11779-
dc.description.abstractBackground N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. Methods We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter. Results A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens. Conclusions We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofSystematic Reviewspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/*
dc.subjectDecontaminationpt_BR
dc.subjectDisinfectionpt_BR
dc.subjectSterilizationpt_BR
dc.subjectEquipment reusept_BR
dc.subjectN95 respiratorpt_BR
dc.subjectCOVID-19pt_BR
dc.titleMask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.resumoBackground N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. Methods We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter. Results A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens. Conclusions We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDEpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:HUMAP - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection a rapid review.pdf
  Until 2025-10-06
906,35 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir    Solictar uma cópia


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons